January 2026

Menopause, Hormones & Heart Health

What does the Evidence Say?

Hormone therapy has become increasingly visible in conversations about menopause.  

Not only as a way to ease symptoms, but as a potential tool for long-term disease prevention.

Heart disease in particular often enters the discussion, given that women’s cardiovascular risk rises in midlife.

So it’s understandable that many women are asking: If oestrogen affects the heart, shouldn’t replacing it protect me?

A recent lecture (from Prof Susan Davis, endocrinologist and menopause researcher) exploring menopause, hormones, and cardiovascular health offers a clearer, and more nuanced look at the discussion.

The short version?

Hormone therapy can be life-changing for symptoms and quality of life. But it does not prevent heart disease. And women’s cardiometabolic risk is shaped long before menopause itself.
That might sound disappointing at first. In reality, it’s quietly empowering.

Oestrogen matters, but not as a cardiovascular cure

Oestrogen plays an important biological role in metabolism and vascular function in both women and men.

In situations of complete oestrogen deficiency (seen in rare genetic conditions or animal models) we see obesity, insulin resistance, and atherosclerosis.

But for the majority of us, menopause is not a state of total oestrogen loss.

Even after periods stop, oestrogen continues to be produced through peripheral conversion in fat, bone, and vascular tissue. This makes human menopause very different from the animal models often used in research.

Watch the video from Prof Susan Davis

Or continue reading my summary, below

 

 

Hormone therapy does not prevent heart disease

Large, high-quality trials (including the Women’s Health Initiative) consistently show that menopausal hormone therapy does not reduce coronary heart disease or heart attacks.

Importantly:
  • There was no overall cardiovascular benefit
  • There was no harm in women who were younger or closer to menopause
  • Any small improvements in blood sugar were outweighed by factors like body fat and waist circumference
Key takeaway: Oestrogen should not be prescribed to prevent cardiovascular disease. 

Starting HRT earlier than symptoms begin, doesn’t guarantee you an advantage

You may have heard of the ‘timing hypothesis’. The idea that oestrogen is heart-protective if started early enough.

The evidence doesn’t support this in a strong enough way for medical guidelines to change (a nuance often lost on social media).

Studies where oestrogen was started within a few years of menopause show:

  • No meaningful reduction in real cardiovascular events
  • At best, small changes in surrogate markers, similar to what lifestyle changes can achieve
Key takeaway: Starting hormones early does not reliably prevent heart disease.

Important shifts happen before menopause

This is one of the most important insights from Prof Susan Davis’ lecture.

Many of the changes we associate with menopause actually begin during perimenopause, when oestrogen levels can still be relatively high:

  • Weight shifting toward the middle
  • Sleep becoming more fragmented
  • Increasing insulin resistance
  • Early vascular dysfunction
These shifts often accelerate before the final menstrual period, not after.
Which means that drawing a hard line at menopause misses the real window when risk is developing.

It would be a mistake to wait for symptoms of peri menopause to develop before considering the power of small and influential lifestyle change.

Key takeaway: Women’s cardiovascular risk is shaped long before oestrogen ‘drops’.

What does this mean for hormone therapy?

None of this means hormone therapy isn’t valuable.
It absolutely is.

Menopausal hormone therapy:

  • Is the most effective treatment for hot flushes and night sweats
  • Can improve sleep, quality of life, and day-to-day functioning
  • Can be used safely for symptom relief, even in many women with cardiovascular risk
Non-oral (transdermal) oestrogen, in particular, is associated with lowered health risk and is often preferred when risk factors are present.
There is no fixed expiry date. Continuation should be individualised.

Key takeaway: hormone therapy is for symptom relief and wellbeing, not disease prevention.

The bigger picture

Women’s cardiovascular health reflects a lifetime of influences, including:
  • Menstrual history
  • Chronic stress and emotional labour
  • Sleep disruption and shift work
  • Mental health
  • Socioeconomic pressures
  • Caregiving roles
These factors often peak before menopause, and they carry forward.

Hormones matter, inside a much larger life-course story.

This perspective reflects how I approach midlife health in my work. To support women with evidence, reassurance, and practical ways to feel more resourced in their bodies and lives.

"So what do this mean for me, at midlife?"

It means we stop looking for a single fix and accept what can be done now.

Hormone therapy can support comfort and quality of life. And for many women, that matters enormously. But long-term health is also shaped by how supported, regulated, rested, and resourced a woman feels in her life.

This isn’t bad news. It’s grounding.

Because it means there is far more within your influence than a prescription alone.

Clinical principle: Hormone therapy is a symptom-management tool, not a disease-prevention strategy.

 

Hormone therapy can be a valuable tool for symptom relief, but it is only one part of a much bigger picture.

In my work with women in midlife, I support a whole-system approach that combines evidence-based information with practical, compassionate support for this stage of life.

If you would like to explore that approach further, you can contact me here: info@angiegarton.com

I currently work with women one to one, and in small groups, both online and in person. 

If you’ve not yet joined my online community – Finding Yourself In Menopause – then check out the link below.

We are available to all women, at any stage of their midlife and menopause journey.